New York Post: Inside the biggest voter fraud bust in California's history — as network of 28 democracy-defying cons are snared

Grade D (64/100). On scene; loaded words

Lehrer score 64/100 (−24 own-voice claim/analysis: charged people called “democracy-defying cons” in the headline before trial; −12 loaded wording: loaded wording: “swooped,” “wannabe voters”). Fixed scale: 90+ A, 80s B, 70s C, 60s D, under 60 F → D.

Loaded words: “democracy-defying cons” (headline), “swooped,” “wannabe voters,” “bombshell lawsuit.” Mentions one defendant's past convictions. Leaves out Bonta's turnout comparison, which CalMatters includes.

Agrees: Same 28 charged under Operation Protect the Vote.

Splits: Profiles named defendants; calls it the state's biggest bust, citing authorities.

Met. Rule: assume there is at least one other side (Newsom quoted)
Broken. Rule: assume innocence until guilt is proven (charged people called “cons”)
Broken. Rule: do not distort, lie, slant or hype (“democracy-defying cons,” “swooped”)

Read at New York Post

Same story: NPR, CalMatters

How the grades work